The Two Parts of Every Sermon

There are two components preached on in every sermon; You Do and Christ Do.  The You Do can be preached as I Do, We Do, or You Do, but they are all effectively the same thing.  For the purposes of this post, I will only refer to it as You Do.  Whether a sermon is good or bad is dependent on how each Do is used. 

 

The bad sermon will say that you need to do X for God.  It will say that we are doing Y for Kingdom.  It say that I have done Z for Jesus.  You can hear a lot of this in pop “Christian” music.  Sure, Jesus gets mentioned seventy-seven times in four minutes and thirteen seconds, but lyrics are strangely me focused.  On the same token, Jesus is often bound and gagged, relegated to a cameo guest appearance with no lines.  At most they make mention that Jesus died for your sins and then brings it back to what you need to do because of it. 

 

The good sermon, however, puts the You Do squarely in the negative.  What You Do is sin and there is nothing that You Do that can ever redeem you.  But the Christ Do of the sermon is glorious.  Christ lived a sinless life.  Christ took your sins, the You Do, upon himself.  Christ died and suffered.  Christ absolved the You Do. 

 

The You Do is tainted in sin, even when You Do good.  The Christ Do forgiveness, mercy, and absolution.  And there is nothing that You Do which is a good apart from what Christ Do. 

Advertisements
Tagged ,

2 thoughts on “The Two Parts of Every Sermon

  1. terriergal says:

    I’m having a hard time with the present tense singular first person conjugation of “do” in the sentences which speak of Christ (which would be third person) but the overall analysis is short, sweet and to the point!

    Like

    • Hahaa! I can understand that. The whole Christ Do started as a little bit of a gripe on a sermon I didn’t particularly like. As I was explaining my feelings on it with my Pastor (don’t worry, he didn’t preach the sermon), I told him that “I felt there was a lot of I do, we do, and you do but not enough Christ do.” I had a flow going in my words and decided to keep with it. Yes, grammatically, it’s really quite terrible, but I stuck with it because I felt it helps drive the point home.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: